osprey_archer: (shoes)
Greetings from Boston! I have been visiting [personal profile] skygiants and [personal profile] genarti and talking about books and watching A Spy Among Friends (someone clearly read Ben MacIntyre's A Spy Among Friends and was like, love it, but wouldn't it be better if Nicholas Elliot and Kim Philby were like at least a little bit in love) and doing far less sightseeing than I had intended. Sometimes one simply gets a bit tired and needs a rest!

However, the little sight-seeing I've done has been top-tier: I went on a tour of Trinity Church, which is the one with the Burne-Jones window, although as it turns out the Burne-Jones part of it is a very small square in the middle of a riot of William Morris vines, which has an interestingly pagan effect. It's an absolutely gorgeous church, stained glass windows in at least six wildly different styles, one of which enraged the congregation, and no, it was not the William Morris vines; it was the up-to-date French stained glass window with perspective?? Whoever heard of a stained glass window with perspective! Stained glass is supposed to look flat my friends!!

But they loved the vines, and they also loved John LaFarge's stained glass windows, which were a totally new technique to stained glass, using sheets of colored glass layered over each other so that the windows look like captured fragments of sky. "Like a Tiffany window?" you say. Exactly like a Tiffany window! LaFarge shared his technique with Tiffany, who rode it to fame and glory. Ain't that always the way?

And also [personal profile] genarti and I went on a tour of the Boston Public Library, with all its beautiful murals. My favorite was the Galahad cycle, which features Galahad all in red (an unusual symbolic choice but an excellent pictorial one) bopping along on his adventures: seeing the grail, battling knights, falling in love with Blanchefleur, taking the grail to the king of something or other who decides to reward Galahad by sending him to heaven directly! "But Blanchefleur?" we cried piteously, and the guide assured as that as Blanchefleur is a pure maiden (a white flower, stainless) she will surely reunite with Galahad in heaven someday... "It's a happy story!" IS IT THOUGH.

It is an interestingly Edwardian twist on the Galahad stories I'm familiar with, though. And I do love the way that Arthurian legends morph: a never-ending mirror of whatever society they find themselves in.

***

Also of course there has been some reading! First, a book from a different library visit, to the New York Public Library - the classic main building, with the lions Patience and Fortitude, which is really more of a museum than an active library now, although there are still reading rooms where people can research with an appointment, and yes I did think a little bit about seeing if I could read one of my 1930s Newbery books there next time I’m in NYC...

Also, when you buy a book from the NYPL gift shop, they stamp it with the NYPL lion stamp. “Will you stamp my blank book too?” I asked shyly, for I had also bought a blank book with a cover patterned after the Hunt-Lenox Globe (one of the library’s treasures; also one of the only maps in the world to actually contain the words “Here be dragons,” in Latin of course), and the clerk kindly did so.

"But which book did you buy?" you demand. It's Stéphane Garnier’s How to Think Like a Cat, which is basically a self-help book about being more like your cat: living in the moment, realizing that you are just fine just as you are, letting go of artificial productivity goals in favor of sitting in the grass stalking a mouse for six hours if that’s what you want to do, etc. It's cute!

The other book is Audrey Erskine Lindop's The Singer Not the Song, a.k.a. The Bandit and the Priest, which sounds like the nickname you would give a book when you want to emphasize how gay it is, but is also, in fact, an official alternate title. I've been on the hunt for this book ever since I read [personal profile] skygiants' amazing review, and I regret to inform you that finishing it has simply put me on another hunt, this time for the sequel, even though the sequel can't possibly live up to the sheer intensity of the priest's battle to save the bandit's soul, which the bandit resists to his utmost because he can't stand the Catholic church, while being unable to quell his admiration of the priest as a human being. If only the priest had given his whole heart and soul to a cause less stupid!

It's very intense! I did however often find myself on the side of the people who tactfully suggested that perhaps Father Keogh ought to put the souls of the rest of his parishioners at least on the level with the soul of Malo the Bandit. Yes yes, no soul is beyond redemption and it would be nice to save Malo, but is it worth endangering every other soul in town?
osprey_archer: (books)
As the month is flying to an end, I thought I'd slide in with some mini-reviews of the latest books I've been reading!

I picked up William John Locke's The Beloved Vagabond because it was one of Maud Hart Lovelace's favorite novels (her copy is actually in a glass case at the Betsy-Tacy Museum), referenced repeatedly in Betsy and the Great World. It is, as it turns out, a very odd book.

For reasons that slowly become clear over the course of the novel, Paragot long since cast aside wealth, education, and name (Paragot is of course an assumed name) to be a feckless drunken wanderer on the face of this earth, who dazzles his acquaintances with brilliant lively talk, but nonetheless holds everyone at arm's length - even the found family that he slowly gathers round himself, which includes our narrator Asticot (who Paragot bought off his mother for half a crown when he discovered the boy reading Paradise Lost; Asticot adores him) and Blanquette the traveling zither player, who finds herself stranded after the elderly violinist who is the other half of her traveling band unexpectedly dies. Paragot, a gifted violinist, flings on the violinist's sequined coat, plays dazzlingly at a peasant weddings, and more or less adopts her.

I can't explain much more without giving away the central mystery, but I will just say that I am fascinated that this was one of Maud Hart Lovelace's favorites, because it's just so different from her own books! But then I guess that's often the case: what you like to write may not be quite the thing that you like to read.

Daisy Hay's Young Romantics: The Shelleys, Byron, and Other Tangled Lives was a gift from [personal profile] troisoiseaux and an absolute roller coaster, as any books about the Shelleys and Byron has to be. This is one of those nonfiction books where the title misleadingly focuses on the most famous people involved: a large part of the book actually revolves around the crusading journalist Leigh Hunt, who was a central figure in the web of relationships that drew many of these second generation Romantic poets in contact with each other.

I was also delighted to learn that the man buried beside Shelley in Rome is some raconteur who met Shelley in the last year of his life, enthralled the whole social circle with wildly inaccurate stories about his past, and after Shelley's death insisted on digging him up and cremating him on the beach, apparently because he just thought that would be so metal. Then he bought to adjoining grave plots, one for Shelley and one for himself, where he was interred decades later under a stone that suggests he and Shelley were bosom buddies, WHEN IN FACT this guy is just some chancer who realized he had stumbled onto an opportunity to clutch the coattails of immortality.

Continuing my Audrey Erskine Lindop read (which kicked off memorably with Details of Jeremy Stretton) with The Self-Appointed Saint! I don't want to spoil this one for [personal profile] skygiants specifically so I will just say that it is a WILD ride. Is it a wild ride that actually hangs together in a vaguely plausible manner? IMO no, but also I didn't really care, why bother my little head about plausibility when the whole thing is so entertainingly nuts.

Doris Gates' Little Vic is perhaps one of THE purest expressions of the Boy Meets Horse genre that I've ever read. The main character loves horses so much that he's nicknamed Pony, and the entire book revolves around his relationship with Little Vic, the colt that he raises and trains and adores.

Gorgeous horse illustrations by Kate Seredy, who either could not be bothered to draw humans when there were horses around (fair!), or was told by the publishers to focus on the horses, as illustrations might make it to obvious to the skittish library buyers of 1951 that Pony is Black. This fact only comes into the narrative about two-thirds of the way through the book, which is... perhaps later than it ought to be... it just seems like something that would probably come up at some point before you meet the book's Token Racist, you know?

Lucretia P. Hale's The Peterkin Papers, which is about a family that is very stupid in an Amelia-Bedelia type fashion. One morning Mrs. Peterkin puts salt in her coffee, and the family summons the chemist to try to remove it, and when he can't they summon the old herb-woman to try to disguise the flavor, and when that doesn't work they turn in desperation to the lady from Philadelphia (their only friend with a brain cell), who suggests... that perhaps Mrs. Peterkin could brew a new cup of coffee!

This was published in 1880, and apparently remained popular with children up through the 1950s. Even as a child I scorned Amelia Bedelia and her ilk, but if this is the sort of thing you like, then it is very much that kind of thing.

And another Lindop, Journey into Stone, which I regret to say was a swing and a miss. Like The Self-Appointed Saint, it doesn't quite come together, but as the book is a mystery novel, this is a pretty big flaw, and also I just didn't like most of the characters. Ah, well, many writers have their off novels!
osprey_archer: (books)
After my Audrey Erskine Lindop haul at John K. King Books, I decided to start with her 1955 release Details of Jeremy Stretton, the one with the canon gay.

This book! Is so much! In every possible way! It’s well-written, and truly quite stressful to read, and also extremely 1955 in all its attitudes. As it’s quite hard to find I’m going to spoil it with gay abandon, so please avert your eyes if you don’t wish to be spoiled.

Spoilers for everything and also content warnings for, like, the 1950s? Also suicide, child molestation, etc. etc. this book is a lot )

“Is it a good book?” you ask. Reader, that depends what you mean. Is it readable, is it engrossing, does Audrey Erskine Lindop grow strong on the tears of her readers? Yes. Is it a fascinating evocation of its period, from which you will learn many interesting things about 1950s attitudes toward gender and sexuality? Also yes.

Does it contain opinions that you, a reader in the year of our lord 2023, will agree with? Absolutely not. I feel confident that no matter what your opinions are, they do not approximate the 1950s psychologist pretzel of “Well homosexuality is caused by early childhood complexes, so it’s not bad exactly. In fact if someone is happy with their homosexuality then the correct psychological stance is to leave them alone. But if they aren’t, you should definitely try to lead them down the path to true fulfillment through heterosexual marriage and babies!”

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 67
8 910 11 121314
15 1617 18 192021
222324 25262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 26th, 2025 05:27 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »